Universal Gaming League

almost 14 years ago

Hi all, i don't know if this topic has already been talked in this forum. If it was, im sorry! But i would like to propose that each team, on the profile, could have a button to challenge the team. Like that we could make more equivalent wars! For ex. my team isn't a great team, like others team here. And when u make match maker, its obvious that greater teams will accept and make it unbalanced. If we could challenge teams, it will be a little more fair, to all. It's just an opinion.
To all the admins, keep the good work, and for the players, always have fun!

Encoded

almost 14 years ago

yeah, and them i put in a match planner, and the other for some reason its not ready to pick the war. and then comes someone high skilled and pick it.
I was just suggesting a way that is easier then the match planner

almost 14 years ago

and then when u get in ungl, your profile shows who challenged you. and then u pick those you want to play, like them.

almost 14 years ago

yeah, its like an other issue to that "problem" tbh. it's what we have been doing.
I think a lot of teams prefer that issue instead of playing against high teams. One thing is sure, if you play lows your score will be not good at all, if you play highs the score will be much better. But the match planner for those who are just here to have some fun, and make nice wars without cheaters, its not good at all.

almost 14 years ago

And i understand you, both. Its ok, we have that issue for that. I was just wondering guys!
Thank you for the answer.

Encoded

almost 14 years ago

ahh, and btw, i will wait for a nuke cup! ahahah

almost 14 years ago

yeah, it was what i wanted to say :)

almost 14 years ago

isnt there no way that teams can challenge other teams ? the likes of ED and KGL are open ladders an they have the challenge system in place.

 Sparky
Really?
almost 14 years ago

Maybe if we had something like a month qualifying session and then your results and win/loss record would see you placed in to team brackets. Then after every month we could review the brackets with the team who is top of the bracket moving up, and the one at the bottom moving down.

So I guess it would look like this:

- 1 month qualifying session with arranged games (is this looking too much like esl?).
- Brackets created; Top, Pro-Amateur, Amateur, skilled.
- A month later the brackets are reviewed & the two teams at the top and bottom of each bracket play a BO3 to decide who goes where.
- Brackets continue to be reviewed after every month, with inactive teams being removed as we go. New teams will be introduced in to the "Amateur" ladder so they can move up and down in good time.

Any thoughts on this? Good/ bad or am I barking up the wrong tree?

almost 14 years ago



 Sparky
new idea are always welcome, all about having options, i like the idea

 nik
cufish!
almost 14 years ago

i like the ladder system, as for the brackets just do them separately and problem solved

almost 14 years ago

Isn't this done similar in KGL, is a nice system tho.

Reply