Universal Gaming League

 Sparky
Really?
over 12 years ago

Given that ESL just forced 'net_graph 0' and 'mp_weapons_allow_zeus 1', what do you think about these changes?

Obviously the net_graph issue is one which has been raised before, but allowing tasers in to competitive play? I think that's a step in the wrong direction.

It's also interesting that 'sv_damage_print_enable 0' is being trialed, even if it is for three weeks; not allowing players to see their damage till the end of the round is something I'm certainly not too keen on, though I wasn't aware this was already mandatory in EPS and EMS.

Thoughts?

(http://www.esl.eu/eu/csgo/news/207353/)

over 12 years ago



 Sparky
Zeus I can't see really effecting competitive play being $1000, net_graph 0 I think is good stops people just staring at it pretty much wallhacking and sv_damage_print_enable 0 I think is a a good step as well it is an unneeded meta game.

over 12 years ago

Is net_graph 1 dIfferent on CSGO then? In CSS netgraph 1 just shows ping etc

over 12 years ago

Isn't it net_graph 2/3 in CSS though? Which zblock kicks you for having enabled? Im guessing netgraph 1 in csgo shows you everything

over 12 years ago


 brajsz
No it is the the figures on netgraph 1 that gives you the advantage especially now csgo is alot more intensive on pcs.

over 12 years ago

Ah, I didn't even know, I know on higher netgraphs you get the actual chart that spikes with sound, I use net graph one on CSS just for my ping and lerp xD

over 12 years ago

I use netgraph 1 on CSS for my ping and lerp, I didn't know it could be used for that, all i knew is higher netgraphs have an actual graph that spikes when there is sound or something

over 12 years ago


 hrizn
Pretty much the same engine so they apply the same...

over 12 years ago

I know it's GO, that's why I asked of the netgraph 1 is different in GO because netgraph 1 isn't banned on css

over 12 years ago


 brajsz
Yes it was at quite a few events including most recently i46 not that it will be at an iseries again.

Reply